What is the Danger of Smuggling Scientific Paradigms into Scriptural Passages?

Smuggling scientific paradigms into scriptural passages has given Christianity one black eye after another. Misunderstanding hermeneutics (interpretation) is often at the root of the problem. Hank Hanegraaff, the host of the π˜‰π˜ͺ𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘈𝘯𝘴𝘸𝘦𝘳 π˜”π˜’π˜― broadcast and the 𝘏𝘒𝘯𝘬 𝘜𝘯𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘦π˜₯ podcast,, notes that churchmen once swallowed the dangerous contention that the earth was stationary on the basis of Psalm 93:1β€”β€œThe world is firmly established; it cannot be moved.” This interpretation, however, is obviously misguided. A quick look at context along with some common sense readily unveils the meaning: the kingdom of the Lord who is β€œrobed in majesty” (hardly a comment on His clothing, v. 1) cannot be shaken by the pseudo-powers of earth. Furthermore, in an attempt to find concord between science and Scripture, Isaiah has been robbed of meaning and magnificence. Some creationists contend that Isaiah teaches sphericity (β€œcircle of the earth,” 40:22); others, that he communicates Big Bang cosmology (β€œstretches out the heavens,” v. 22). On the other side of the fence, anti-creationists believe that Isaiah was either a flat-earther (β€œspreads [the heavens] out like a tent,” v. 22) or an evolutionist contending that people evolved from pests (β€œpeople are like grasshoppers,” v. 22). The very thought must surely cause Isaiah to turn over in his grave (literalist alert!). Finally, with astronomy texts in one hand and the Bible in the other, some conclude that, like Isaiah, Job was hip to Big Bang cosmology: β€œ[God] alone stretches out the heavens and treads on the waves of the sea” (Job 9:8). Conversely, antisupernaturalists contend that an unevolved Job thought that earth was set on pillars: β€œHe shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble” (v. 6). While the earth is spherical and Big Bang cosmology does accord well with the first few words of Genesis, the dangers of smuggling scientific paradigms into biblical passages should be evident. Far better that we recommit ourselves to mastering the art and science of biblical interpretationβ€”or, for that matter, of literature in general.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Generated by Feedzy
%d bloggers like this: